We have not passed from an era of peace to a world at war. And despite what we are told, war is not a natural state for humans.
11 April 2023 | James Porteous | Clipper Media News
We find ourselves in a time of transition.
I do not believe it is a movement away from peace and into war.
We have been in a state of war for as long as most of us can remember. Indeed, young people have literally never known any other way of life.
It has been so long, in fact, that we have come to believe that war is a natural state for humans.
I do believe that to be true, either. And nor do billions of other people around the world.
Think about that. BILLIONS of people might begin each day blessing the sun or feeling the joy of watching their children going off to school or looking forward to moments of peace while sitting with a coffee in their cups.
We have been led to believe those people are living in a fantasy world. They are seemingly incapable of seeing the ‘truths’ that we see.
What are the truths that we know? We know beyond any reasonable doubt that humans are vile, that we exist only to fight and debate, that we care more about ourselves than the planet, and that consumerism is the very backbone of our daily existence.
We believe we know these things in part because most of us spent the last two years taking and fighting for our side in The Covid-19 Pandemic Debate.
So prevalent are these notions we often find ourselves continuing to avoid friends who may have wondered aloud about wearing a mask, musicians who dared talk about losing the ability to play guitar after receiving a vaccination, or politicians who may have taken a stand opposite to our own.
In hindsight, there is every possibility that we were all wrong. Both sides.
And, if that is the case, then there is an even stronger possibility that our passion for this war and those being openly planned in the future are also misguided.
And if that is true, it is for exactly the same reason: We are being treated like zombies incapable of rational thought, afraid to live life without conflict or war or manufactured ‘viral’ subplots.
As Sara Flounders and host Oksana Boyko say in this program, we have moved long-past the point of debates about war and peace.
Or to put it another way: Maybe it is time for us to join the rest of the world and grow the fuck up.
And one final point – I am indeed aware that this program is hosted, produced, and broadcast by Russians. If that offends your sensibilities in this period of fake transition from peace to war – please don’t watch it. And feel free to blame the messenger but I will not respond. As I said, it is time to move on and get back to being humans and not machines.
James Porteous | Clipper Media News
Crippled superiority? Sara Flounders, Co-director of the International Action Center
Please CLICK HERE to watch this program. Apologies if it is blocked in your region or country
Program introduction by host Oksana Boyko.
They hate us, our way of life, our freedom, our democracy — for decades, that has been the catch-all justification for the United States to go to war or impose sanctions with little consideration for the cost or the consequences.
Or at least that was the case until Washington attempted to sanction the entire world in its bid to penalize Russia.
Have the Americans finally bitten off more than they can chew?
To discuss this, Oksana is joined by Sara Flounders, the co-director of the International Action Center, member of the Secretariat of the Workers World Party and editor of the anthology ‘Sanctions: A Wrecking Ball in a Global Economy’.
Sara Flounders is an American political writer and has been active in progressive and anti-war organizing since the 1960s. She is a member of the Secretariat of Workers World Party, as well as a principal leader of the International Action Center. She also frequently writes for Workers World newspaper. Wikipedia
The International Action Center (IAC) is an activist group founded in 1992 by former United States Attorney General Ramsey Clark. It supports anti-imperialist movements around the world, and opposes U.S. military intervention in all circumstances.
U.S. uses Taiwan as pawn for war on China
Sara Flounders posted on April 4, 2023
While the U.S.-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine continues unabated, the U.S. is preparing at breakneck speed for war with China, using Taiwan as the excuse. Taiwan, like Ukraine, is a pawn. The military and economic threats on both China and Russia are a desperate bid to quash the emergence of a multipolar world.
U.S. imperialist hegemony is being challenged from every side. De-dollarization among major economies of the Global South is a component of trade agreements among the powerful emerging economies of China, Russia, Iran, Brazil, India, Malaysia and South Africa. Even Saudi Arabia, a reactionary bulwark of U.S. domination in West Asia, is willing to seek new agreements with Iran and is interested in trading their oil in Chinese yuan renminbi, rather than be wholly dependent on U.S. dollars.
Even more threatening to U.S. capitalists is that China is developing trade relations with the 40 countries sanctioned by Washington, and they are doing this by barter and direct currency exchanges. This works around the almighty dollar, the international reserve currency that has dominated global trade and capital flows for 100 years.
These are not the first efforts to find a replacement to U.S. dollar domination. There is no crime that U.S. imperialism wouldn’t commit to preserve the U.S. dollar. Both oil rich Iraq, which proposed a currency based on the dinar in 1990 and Libya, which attempted an African currency in 2010 found they had fabulous resources but no protection from U.S. bombs. Their efforts at sovereignty led to their brutal destruction by U.S. imperialism.
The aspiration to break free of U.S. corporate control is today being challenged by many more countries. China is a more formidable opponent.China is surpassing the U.S. in gross domestic product and the development of its economy. China is the top trading partner to more than 120 countries and the largest external trading partner of the European Union.
The ability of China to provide trillions of dollars in development funds through the Belt and Road Initiative means that developing countries can now have more favorable trade relations without the International Monetary Fund and World Bank’s onerous conditions. This option is a threat to every U.S. bank and U.S.-controlled financial institution.
China and a growing number of countries are in an increasingly stronger position to resist the U.S.’s unequal demands. Countries with three-quarters of the world’s population refused to go along with sanctions on Russia. Will they be willing to accept U.S. sanctions on China?
All of this poses a threat to the hegemony of the U.S., the center of world imperialism. The capitalist system is relentlessly driven to expand or die — and now it is shrinking. For multibillionaires and corporate CEOs, this is a life-or-death crisis.
Provoking conflict to retain hegemony.
U.S. strategy is to sabotage Taiwan and its trade with China, by creating conflicts and imposing sanctions. These desperate efforts to reverse Washington’s declining global position will disrupt the global economy.
Presently Taiwan’s trade with China is far bigger than its trade with the U.S. Mainland China and Hong Kong accounted for 42% of Taiwan’s exports last year, while the U.S. had only a 15% share, according to official Taiwan data.
For Taiwan’s imports, mainland China and Hong Kong again ranked first with a 22% share. The U.S. only had a 10% share, ranking behind Japan, Europe and Southeast Asia. South Korea and Japan have greater trade levels with China than with the U.S. (cnbc.com)
The problem U.S. imperialists face is how to reverse this — how to force countries in the Asia Pacific to act against their own economic interests.
The U.S.-NATO war in Ukraine was a strategy to impose sanctions on Russia and to break the EU’s trade with Russia. In 2020 the EU was Russia’s first trading partner; 36.5% of Russia’s imports came from the EU, and 37.9% of its exports went to the EU. The EU was the largest investor in Russia. Russian trade with the EU has since been reduced to 5.8%. (tinyurl.com/55fh6j6f)
The U.S.-NATO war in Ukraine has failed to destabilize and collapse Russia, as the U.S. had hoped. But the war devastated the economy of Ukraine and disrupted the EU, which went along with the sanctions demanded by the U.S. The economies of Europe have suffered greatly. Inflation, recession and supply-chain chaos due to sanctions have harshly cut into the EU’s own markets and increased European dependence on the U.S.
U.S. threats and escalating demands to sanction China will severely damage the economies of Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and the Philippines.
To force high-tech companies to decouple from the People’s Republic of China, U.S. imperialism needs a political-military crisis with China. Every U.S. plan for sanctions on China starts with a manufactured crisis over Taiwan.
The U.S. is frantically seeking to stop China’s economic rise by militarily encircling it. Utilizing Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Australia and the Philippines, U.S. strategy is to create an Asian version of NATO, a military alliance to disrupt economic cooperation in Asia. This is a terrible danger to the people of Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China. Throughout the entire region, peoples face a U.S.-created crisis that can destroy their lives and futures and ruin their economies.
Poor and working people in the U.S. will be forced to pay for this war, as they pay for every war with steadily deteriorating conditions.
China is one!
In the drive to find an excuse for war, the U.S. government is reversing a position Washington had agreed to and signed more than 50 years ago with China.
China has spent decades developing its economic relations with Taiwan; trade between the island and mainland China has grown, along with political and cultural relations. To counter this effort at peaceful reunification, the Pentagon is turning Taiwan into a porcupine, bristling with billions of dollars in military equipment. Another $10 billion in military aid was just promised.
Washington is openly violating three different signed agreements — joint communiques it made with China in 1972, 1979 and 1982 — affirming that China is one country and Taiwan is a province of China. Such commitments are the political foundation for China’s diplomatic relationship with the U.S. and with every country.
China has not threatened Taiwan. China has only asserted what is recognized by the U.S. and 181 other countries, as well as the United Nations and all international bodies: Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan’s own constitution affirms that Taiwan is a province of China. It is the U.S. that has broken its promises not to interrupt China’s efforts to reunify the island peacefully.
Instead of adherence to the One-China Policy, dangerous mobilization is taking place on military and political levels. The recent manufactured crisis over a Chinese hot air balloon followed by Congressional hearings grilling the CEO of TikTok represent new levels in psychological war propaganda, designed to convince the U.S. population that China is an enemy and a threat.
Democrats and Republicans try to outdo each other condemning China. Taiwan was referred to as “the beating heart to our Indo-Pacific strategy” by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Menendez, a Democrat. (foreign.senate.gov)
Military preparations against China include U.S. pressure for Japan to double its military budget and become the third largest military in the world, in violation of the Japanese constitution.
A new agreement, announced Feb. 2, granted the U.S. military access to nine bases in the Philippines to counter China. Foreign bases are in direct violation of the Philippine constitution. In 1992 a massive peoples’ movement forced the U.S. to close its bases in the Philippines.
More ominously, in early February four-star Air Force Gen. Michael Minihan, head of the Pentagon’s Air Mobility Command, in a “leaked memo” predicted war with China over Taiwan in two years. Gen. Minihan oversees 107,000 airmen and 1,100 cargo, tanker and transport planes. The memo includes training, drills and preparations for war in 2025 and specific orders: “Defeat China” and “Be prepared for deployment at a moment’s notice.” (tinyurl.com/2a7ctjae)
Another threat was the largest-ever launch from a U.S. base of huge C-17 transport aircrafts Jan. 5, as training for a naval blockade of China. This is the opening round of a massive missile-and-air assault on mainland China — the Pentagon’s Air-Sea Battle strategy.
The U.S. Pacific Fleet consists of approximately 200 ships and submarines, nearly 1,200 aircraft and more than 130,000 sailors and civilian workers. The U.S. regularly sends naval patrols and destroyers through the 180-km-wide Taiwan Strait (about 112 miles).
China condemned these arrogant displays of U.S. military power as reckless, provocative and meant to apply pressure.
Taiwan’s ‘president’ visits U.S.
Inflated media coverage greeted the visit to New York City of Tsai Ing-wen, the so-called “president” of Taiwan. (“President” is in quotes because Taiwan is recognized as an island province of China and not as an independent country by the U.N. and 181 countries.)
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning objected to this Taiwanese delegation visit and the receptions held in Tsai Ing-wen’s honor, as a violation of the One-China Policy: “China firmly opposes any form of official interaction between the U.S. and Taiwan.” Mao Ning said the U.S. was “conducting dangerous activities that undermine the political foundation of bilateral ties.” (abcnews.go.com)
Xu Xueyuan, charge d’affaires at the Chinese embassy in Washington, said China does not accept the U.S. claims that Tsai’s trip is merely a “transit,” saying “the so-called ‘transit’ is merely a disguise to her true intention of seeking breakthrough and advocating Taiwan independence” and accuses the U.S. of allowing Tsai to “make a splash” and of arranging her meeting with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. (nbcnews.com)
While in New York City, Tsai Ing-wen was treated to a banquet and “Global Leadership” award from the Hudson Institute, an influential, right-wing think tank funded in part by Taiwan. The Brookings Institution, the Center for American Progress, the Center for a New American Security, the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Hudson Institute actively promote expanded arms sales and trade agreements with Taiwan and anti-China propaganda. These five prominent think tanks receive substantial funding from Taiwan.
The visit reinforces Tsai Ing-wen’s standing, at a time when she is in a seriously weakened political position. She was forced to resign as head of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party of Taiwan, after her party suffered a major setback in local elections in November, which was the DPP’s worst performance since its founding in 1986. The election debacle confirms that the DPP’s aggressive stand on independence is losing support in Taiwan.
Tsai Ing-wen’s visit to Guatemala and Belize, two of only 13 remaining countries that recognize Taiwan, was overshadowed by the Honduran Foreign Ministry’s announcement that its government now recognized “only one China in the world” and that Beijing “is the only legitimate government that represents all of China.”
The statement added that “Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory, and as of today the Honduran government has informed Taiwan of the severance of diplomatic relations, pledging not to have any official relationship or contact with Taiwan.” (pbs.org) Honduras is the ninth diplomatic ally Taiwan has lost since the pro-independence Tsai first took office in May 2016.
China has held a consistent, well-understood position on its sovereignty and territorial integrity that is recognized internationally in all world bodies. China has repeatedly asserted its right to resolve this unfinished national reunification. China’s long-held position is that cooperation, trade and development can overcome differences; it is the only way forward.
The preparation of U.S. imperialism for a possible war with China — surrounding it with military bases and nuclear weapons and military vessels — is a highly dangerous provocation. U.S. wars are for corporate profit.
