Photo: FILE – A fleet of Taiwanese military vehicles loading U.S.-made TOW anti-tank missiles rehearse for National Day celebrations in Taipei, Taiwan, Oct. 8, 2007.
09 May 2023 | James Porteous | Clipper Media News
The US Military’s Massive Global Transportation System (2022)
Top 10 Largest Employers in the World
1. The US Department of Defence: 2.86 million people
The United States Department of Defence is the largest employer in the world, employing 2.86 million people in total. Both civilian employees and serving personnel are included in this group. The United States military not only has the most personnel of any armed force, but it also has the greatest defence budget in the world, which totalled $738 billion in 2020.
The United States Department of Defense is a federal executive branch department tasked with organising and supervising all government departments and services directly related to national security and the United States Armed Forces. The Department of Defense is the world’s largest employer, with about 1.34 million active-duty service members (soldiers, marines, sailors, airmen, and guardians) as of June 2022.
The Department of Defence also employs over 778,000 National Guard and reservists, as well as over 747,000 civilians, for a total of over 2.87 million people. The Department of defence (DoD) is headquartered in the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, just outside Washington, D.C., and its declared objective is to provide “the armed forces required to deter war and ensure our nation’s security.”
The U.S. Marine Corps Logistics Command – An in-depth look
In this video we take an in-depth look at the U.S. Marine Corps Logistics Command (MARCORLOGCOM) headquartered in Albany, Ga.
How The US Military Spends $800B Per Year On War Machines (2023)
The US spends more on its military that the next nine nations combined. Both its aircraft carrier and F-35 programs have gone way over budget – while America continues to innovate its next-generation weapons for the battlefields of Ukraine.
Hundreds of US military vehicles arrive in Dutch port to strengthen NATO defences (2023)
The Taliban has been showing off the military hardware left by the US in Afghanistan. The group held a parade in Kandahar – its spiritual birthplace – featuring various pieces of US and NATO military equipment left behind after allied forces left the country.
Speed Kills: Supply Chain Lessons from the War in Iraq (2003)
December 2003 | Diane K. Morales and Steve Geary | Harvard Business Review
Every seasoned leader knows that even the most brilliant strategy is only as good as its execution. Battle plans that seem full of promise on the whiteboard can be undone in the field by clumsy operations or a missing link in the supply chain. This was the fear in some quarters last March when U.S. general Tommy R. Franks outlined the attack plans for Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Under conventional military doctrine, Franks would have sent more than a quarter million soldiers marching through the Euphrates Valley, supported by a mountain of matériel—clothing, medicines, food, fuel, and so on—and secure lines of supply all the way to the foxholes. Instead, Franks envisioned a swarming, rapid, responsive force capable of identifying and removing threats immediately. It’s a strategic shift analogous to one made by many businesses in recent years—competing on speed more than on mass—and it had profound implications for the way we handled the logistics of the operation. Commercial supply chains may be able to draw a few lessons from our efforts to accommodate soldiers in the field.
Make collaboration a reality.
The supply chain ideal for most businesses is close collaboration and management of logistics that extends all the way to customers’ doors—and even inside their operations. For us, the challenge was to achieve “jointness”—the integration of the four branches of the armed services. As recently as the Persian Gulf War in 1991, our forces were still operating on separate tracks, like the different divisions of a large corporation. To make them more reliant on one another, and to facilitate communication among them, we created a single logistics back room. That meant all our ground forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom—the Marines, the Army, coalition partners, and others—used a single distribution network.
In large part, we relied on private-sector manufacturers, distributors, and suppliers to provide the combined forces with fast, flexible, and decisive support—we estimate that more than 85% of all sustainment matériel moved to the theater on civilian transport.
We also teamed with vendors to ensure that vital weapons systems were supported efficiently. For example, we struck performance-based logistics agreements for the F18 aircraft and the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS). The goal was to move away from paying the commercial contractors that supported these systems on a per-repair basis. Instead, we made their pay contingent on overall system availability—or as we call it, “power by the hour.” The planes and systems that operated under these collaborative contracts aimed at minimizing downtime generally achieved operational availability superior to those under conventional support. The Super Hornet fighter aircraft used in Iraq, for example, achieved better than a 97.5% sortie completion rate, with 92% operational availability. By contrast, the operational availability of conventionally supported aircraft is about 80%, on average.
Manage the flow, not the inventory.
Military leaders learned a painful lesson during the Gulf War. Planners called for 60 days of supplies to be accumulated in the theater, prior to ground attack. We found that we could push that massive amount of matériel, but we literally could not see the contents of the containers once they were in transit or in theater. The result was many broken links in the supply chain. Ultimately, matériel in 40,000 shipping containers—fully half of the supplies sent to the region—was never used.
That experience underscores a truth that commercial logisticians know well: Well-stocked inventory that doesn’t get where it’s needed does not deliver value. Supply chain excellence consists of knowing exactly what you have—the condition and location of the items, whether they are on order, in transit, or in theater—and managing the flow of that matériel in light of shifting patterns of demand and customer requirements.
Well-stocked inventory that doesn’t get where it’s needed does not deliver value.
It’s a daunting challenge but one we were able to overcome. Even the most fluid battlefields have at least some degree of predictability, as Major General Dennis Jackson, the logistics chief for Central Command during Operation Iraqi Freedom, told USA Today. The key is to combine this predictability with the right amount of reserve supplies in a consolidated pipeline (our single logistics back room) that can deliver a steady flow to combat units. Support was delivered where it was required, when it was required, and the waste associated with Desert Storm’s “iron mountain” of unused supplies was avoided.
Go with off-the-shelf technology, pushed to the limit.
The biggest challenge during Operation Iraqi Freedom was keeping up with the rapidly moving forces, Brigadier General Jack C. Stultz, Jr. observed shortly after the combat phase ended. “It was not so much being able to supply them but to locate where they were moving to,” he noted.
We met that challenge with a combination of information technologies. Each combat unit was equipped with transponders, allowing both combat leaders and logisticians at Central Command to track the troops’ movement in real time. Similarly, radio frequency identification (RFID) tags were attached to all inbound matériel containers at the point of shipment. These tags were tracked across the globe and along the troops’ line of advance. These data, plus information from other systems, were integrated into a common operating picture, which allowed the coalition to achieve real-time information dominance—in both combat and logistics management.
The military is often an early user of technologies that the commercial sector is still exploring in terms of their potential costs and benefits. RFID is a good example of that, but much of our successful deployment of this technology was based on commercially available applications and capabilities. During Operation Iraqi Freedom, authorized users, operating from secure computer systems in remote locations, could monitor matériel flowing past critical checkpoints in Iraq. This and other similar experiences confirmed for us that leading-edge commercial technologies, prudently selected and properly implemented, could provide rapid, reliable decision support. And we are now collaborating with Wal-Mart, as the retailer experiments with RFID technology.
The Defense Department’s most recent transformation efforts have been designed to achieve savings, improve effectiveness, and deliver agility. Under the banner of the Future Logistics Enterprise, we have been pursuing three goals: end-to-end warfighter support, enterprise integration, and total life-cycle systems management. In Operation Iraqi Freedom, for the first time, we saw our proof of concept. Our ability to manage logistics more effectively was crucial to the coalition’s success in the field. As General Franks put it, “Speed kills…the enemy.”
A version of this article appeared in the November 2003 issue of Harvard Business Review.
Readers Also Viewed These Items
- Pain in the (Supply) Chain (HBR Case Study)Magazine ArticleBuy Now
- Walmart: Navigating a Changing Retail LandscapeCase StudyBuy Now
Read more on Risk management or related topics Operations strategy, Technology and analytics, Supply chain management and Aerospace and defense sector