Recent events in the investment world indicate that the time to make a killing in military industrial complex stock options is now!
19 October 2022 | James Porteous | Clipper Media News
I know what you are thinking: Ordinary people do not buy stocks in companies whose main reason for existing is a short-term plan is to kill us. Demented blood-thirsty CEOs and hapless impotent politicians -sure- but regular folk?
Hear me out. This entire ‘cost of living’, US proxy war, fuel ‘shortages,’ inflation combo is the final nail in the coffin (ours) that began with the ‘Covid Lockdown Monetary Relief Fund.’ The only way out of this quagmire is to institute a full-on US-funded war economy.
In other words, the money you have now -it you still have any- won’t be worth shit once the prepping for WW3Inc, the USA’s state and corporate-sponsored World War is compelete.
The time to make a killing is now!
As you will see in the two articles below, the time to cash in is running out.
But as you may be aware, the cost of investing is not cheap.
So why not band together as one and do a massive GoFundMe fund-drive before inflation and cost of living expenses eat up every last penny we might ever have.
The time to make a killing is now!
James Porteous | Clipper Media News
See Also: CMN’s The Next World War is at Your Door – WW3Inc. An ongoing collection of World War III posters urging civvies to start preparing for WW3Inc, the USA’s state and corporate-sponsored World War.WW3Inc – Clipper Media News
Investing in Defense Stocks
Defense companies get the bulk of their revenue from one customer — the U.S. government. Fortunately, that customer has deep pockets and a long history of paying its bills. The federal government’s stability gives defense companies and investors some predictability when it comes to managing cash and projecting growth.
Companies in the defense sector offer a wide range of products and services to their main customer, and some are better investments than others. Here’s what you need to know about investing in the defense sector and how to pick where to put your money.
Top defense stocks
1. Lockheed Martin
Lockheed Martin is the world’s largest defense company and the U.S. government’s biggest contractor. It’s the lead contractor on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the world’s most expensive airplane. Lockheed’s legendary “Skunk Works” research facility in California is world-renowned, and the company has leveraged its research muscle to become a leader in advanced fighter planes, high-tech missiles, and cutting-edge electronics.
Boeing is best known for its commercial airplanes, but its defense business is large enough to rank among the industry’s titans. Boeing makes several different aircraft and helicopters for the Pentagon and is also involved in space pursuits. The company’s defense business has also branched out into autonomous submarines and other products.
3. Northrop Grumman
Northrop Grumman is responsible for stealth bombers and has a large space portfolio. The company is closely tied to the nuclear triad, a combination of nuclear missiles, bombers, and submarines able to strike back if the nation is attacked.
4. General Dynamics
General Dynamics is one of two primary military shipbuilders and has a portfolio of tanks and land vehicles that makes it one of the go-to vendors for the U.S. Army. General Dynamics also has one of the largest defense-focused IT and services businesses, giving it some revenue stability at times when the Pentagon is cutting back on equipment purchases.
5. Raytheon Technologies
Raytheon Technologies doesn’t make warships or fighters, but it has a role in a wide range of important military platforms led by other contractors. It is the product of the 2020 merger between Raytheon, a defense electronics and missile specialist, and United Technologies, which makes aircraft engines and a variety of other aerospace parts.
6. Leidos Holdings
Leidos Holdings is the largest government information technology (IT) company. It has also actively expanded into hardware, providing the electronics and brains for autonomous ships and building a strong portfolio of classified research capabilities geared for the intelligence and space community.
Amid the escalating war with Russia in Ukraine and US plans for war with China, the United States is rapidly moving toward a wartime mobilization of its economy.
Last week, the two highest-ranking Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Armed Services Committee introduced a bill granting the Pentagon emergency wartime procurement powers, removing major peacetime limitations on arms purchases by the Pentagon and procuring missiles in wartime quantities.
In an amendment to the annual National Defense Authorization bill, the Senate Armed Services Committee’s Democratic chairman, Jack Reed, and the ranking Republican committee member, Jim Inhofe, proposed to increase US procurement of long-range missiles such as the HIMARS by 10 times or more.
The bill comes as the United States intensifies its involvement in its proxy war with Russia in Ukraine, while making it abundantly clear that it is seeking to provoke a war with China over Taiwan. In both conflicts, the type of long-range weapons being procured in massive quantities under the bill are seen as critical.
“Whether you want to call it wartime contracting or emergency contracting, we can’t play around anymore,” a senior congressional aide told Defense News.
Chillingly, the aide referred to “operational plans” against China, implying that the Pentagon has a timetable for war with the world’s most populous country. “It’s hard to think of something as high on everybody’s list as buying a ton of munitions for the next few years, for our operational plans against China and continuing to supply Ukraine,” the aide said.
The wartime procurement procedures would allow the Department of Defense to make non-competitive awards to arms manufacturers for contracts related to Ukraine, and remove restrictions requiring contractors to provide accurate cost data – measures intended to protect taxpayer funds.
The sheer numbers of armaments requisitioned by the bill are consistent with a full-scale war – or even two. The public text of the bill calls for the procurement of 700 HIMARS systems, the long-range missile launchers credited with turning the tide in the war in Ukraine.
To date, 16 HIMARS systems have been delivered and deployed in Ukraine. The number now being procured is more than 40 times greater than the number sent so far.
Since the HIMARS system first entered into deployment approximately 20 years ago, some 540 units have been built, averaging about 54 units per year. This means that the current bipartisan proposal would increase the production rate nearly twenty-fold.
The amendment procures 6,000 ATACMS missiles, capable of striking targets at a distance of hundreds of miles, and 100,000 of the GMLRS missiles fired by the HIMARS systems in Ukraine.
To date, the United States has provided 126 155mm howitzers to Ukraine. But the procurement for the 2023-24 budget year would secure an additional 1,000 units of the weapon.
The massively expanded military procurement takes place amid a years-long program to expand the United States’ nuclear arsenal, including the purchase of all-new intercontinental ballistic missiles, strategic bombers, and nuclear-capable submarines.
In June, a strategy document adopted by NATO pledged to prepare the alliance’s members “for high-intensity, multi-domain warfighting against nuclear-armed peer-competitors.”
In September, the Defense Department announced that the United States and its allies were planning to “expand their nations’ industrial base” for building bombs, rockets and artillery for the war with Russia in Ukraine.
In the name of “providing long-term support to Ukraine,” the the US and its allies pledged to massively escalate their wartime production of “ground-based long range fires, air defense systems [and] air-to-ground munitions,” the Pentagon wrote.
The plans to put the US economy and supply chain on a war footing comes against the backdrop of growing demands within the US political establishment for a wartime “mobilization.” On Tuesday, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken claimed that the Chinese military was planning to seize Taiwan on a “much faster timeline,” amid the deepening Sino-American standoff over the Taiwan Strait.
The conflict between the United States and China was intensified in August by the visit to Taiwan by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Elbridge Colby, one of the principal authors of the 2018 National Defense Strategy, called for a national “mobilization” against China. “Why are we not on a national mobilization footing?” Colby asked. “If we get in a war we will have to be, but by then it may be too late.”
The calls for aggressively expanding the United States’ industrial base for wartime procurement comes against the backdrop of provocative war games launched by the United States throughout Europe.
On Monday, the Pentagon confirmed that the United States has placed the George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier battle group under NATO control as part of a major military exercise in the Mediterranean Sea.
Asked by a reporter Monday “what kind of message the US was trying to send to Russia by doing this,” a Pentagon spokesperson replied, “It just shows the power of the Alliance,” adding “we will defend every square inch of NATO territory.”
The maritime operation, known as Neptune Strike, takes place simultaneously with a US nuclear war training exercise known as Steadfast Noon, in which B-52 bombers and F-16 fighters simulate dropping atomic bombs over Europe.
Amid escalating tensions, strikes by the Russian and Ukrainian military targeting civilian infrastructure raged on both sides of the border between the two countries on Sunday, Monday and Tuesday.
On Sunday, RIA Novosti reported that 16 explosions were heard throughout the Russian city of Belgorod, some 25 miles from the Ukrainian border. That same day, the administrative building in the Russian-occupied city of Donetsk in the Donbas was destroyed by shelling.
These strikes were followed Monday and Tuesday by a series of aerial attacks on civilian infrastructure in Ukraine, including in Kiev, and Ukrainian authorities reported that one third of the country’s power stations were damaged.
US-aligned military analysts gloated that the attacks on civilians depleted the store of weapons available to Russian forces, with the UK’s Ministry of Defense declaring, “Russia’s defense industry is probably incapable of producing advanced munitions at the rate they are being expended.” It added that Russia’s depletion of its long-range missiles “is likely to constrain their ability to strike the volume of targets they desire in future.”
In other words, the US and its NATO allies see Ukrainian civilians as little more than cannon fodder, soaking up Russia’s long-range missiles and procuring an advantage on the battlefield for the NATO-aligned forces.
In March, President Joe Biden said the US is not “going to send in offensive equipment” to Ukraine because it would trigger “World War III.” Over the subsequent months, the United States has flooded Ukraine with armored vehicles, long-range missiles, drones and even aircraft. On October 7, Biden warned that the escalating war in Ukraine risks “Armageddon” – referring to nuclear war.
Last month, Russian President Vladimir Putin threatened to launch a nuclear strike if the United States or NATO seeks to attack either the Russian homeland or territories annexed by Russia last month.
On October 6, one day before Biden’s “Armageddon” comment, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky at a meeting of an Australian think tank called for NATO to carry out preemptive strikes on Russia to prevent the “possibility of Russia using nuclear weapons.”
“What should NATO do? Eliminate the possibility of Russia using nuclear weapons,“ Zelensky said. “We need preventive strikes, so they know what will happen to them if they use nukes, and not the other way around.”
Zelenzky’s comments raised questions as to whether he was advocating that the United States carry out a nuclear attack on Russia as the only way to cripple Russian nuclear capabilities.
The escalation of the US war drive is in keeping with the Biden administration’s National Security Strategy, issued last week, which pledged to expand the US military, “integrate” economic life with war-making, and “win the competition for the 21st century” in what it called the “decisive decade.”
In his letter announcing the strategy, Biden declared that “Our National Defense Strategy relies on integrated deterrence: the seamless combination of military… and non-military… domains.”
The White House’s fact sheet on the document declares that “The Biden-Harris Administration has broken down the dividing line between domestic and foreign policy.”
As the Biden administration escalates its plans for full-scale war with Russia and China, it is clear that these war plans will entail a massive attack on the social, economic and political rights of the working class, which will be told it must accept poverty wages and intolerable working conditions in the name of the war effort.
The relentless escalation of the war must be stopped! We urge all of those who agree with this perspective to contact us today.